How is this woman a fashion icon?
I mean, yes, her hair and makeup look good, but her outfit is heinous. I know the 90’s are back, and that’s great, since it’s my favorite decade so far from my fairly short life, but honestly? Bringing back the floral prints from 1992 are not necessary. I see enough of them when I look through family photo albums. There’s a reason why those prints went out of style, and that’s because they are ugly as hell. I’m pretty sure the dress I wore for my second-grade school portrait has a similar print.
I’m confused with what’s going on with this dress. It looks like it’s backwards to me. And with the black pantyhose? No.
Katie Holmes doesn’t always wear bad outfits – I do like some of the things she wears. But I dislike how she’s morphed into this supposed style icon. She’s not. If anything, she’s morphed off of Victoria Beckham, who has actual style. Posh and other real fashionistas, like Gwen Stefani, can wear pretty much anything and look amazing and to me, that’s the real mark of a true stylista. If you attempt these outfits yourself, you will look stupid and will probably be snickered at as you attempt to wear the outfit in public, but somehow they pull it off. That’s real talent.
Katie Holmes is not there yet. I don’t know if she will ever be. Besides, her style is so staid and proper for her age. She is only 31 and yet sometimes I feel like she’s wearing items from the “mature” catalog.
Finally, she dresses her toddler in high heels (!!!), which means I will never take her seriously as a human being.